Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Brayden Schnur Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rijthoven vs Schnur analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Van Rijthoven vs Brayden Schnur Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rijthoven 1 - 1 Schnur
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rijthoven has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Schnur has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rijthoven, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schnur has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rijthoven has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schnur has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rijthoven has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Schnur winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rijthoven has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 73% (W/L 8/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 61/ 47). Schnur has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 15/ 12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 11/ 17).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rijthoven winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Rijthoven winning 3 and Schnur winning 2. The last match between Rijthoven and Schnur was at the Forli 4 Challenger, 17-02-2022, Second, I.hard with Tim Van Rijthoven getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:47:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rijthoven and Schnur have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rijthoven winning 0 times and Schnur 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rijthoven winning 1, and Schnur 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rijthoven has played against opponents with an average rank of while Schnur has played against players with an average rank of 306.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rijthoven has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schnur has won 20% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rijthoven has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schnur has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rijthoven 1 - 1 Schnur
871
Rank
101
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
879
Rank
92
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
62% (234-141)
Career Total W/L
52% (221-200)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$499,600
Career Prize Money
$240,710
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tim Van Rijthoven | Brayden Schnur |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 26 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 12 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:35 | 1:47:35 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (115/155) | 55% (91/166) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (82/115) | 77% (70/91) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (22/40) | 51% (38/75) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 31% (4/13) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (58/166) | 33% (51/155) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats 
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Brayden Schnur
75%
(
64 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
48 of
84)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
52%
(
43 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
51 of
70)
5
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
0
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Van Rijthoven | Brayden Schnur |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tim Van Rijthoven Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
21
Aces
13
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
42 of
47)
69%
(
27 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
21 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
22%
(
16 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alex Molcan
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
27
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
4
79%
(
58 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
61 of
86)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
30 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
126)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(6) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leandro Riedi
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
10 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
48
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aslan Karatsev
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
91)
9
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
6
82%
(
47 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
25 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
28 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(7) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Radu Albot
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
14
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
22 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
51%
(
37 of
73)
10
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
10
Aces
15
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
36 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
32 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
20 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Viktor Durasovic
75%
(
91 of
121)
1st Serve %
68%
(
88 of
130)
25
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
61 of
88)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
40 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
130)
128
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominic Stricker
Player
Tim Van Rijthoven
57%
(
42 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
11
Aces
13
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
88)
84
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Brayden Schnur Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Collin Altamirano
Player
Brayden Schnur
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
3
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
45 of
62)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
37%
(
40 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Michelsen
Player
Brayden Schnur
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
8
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
48 of
69)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
49 of
112)
109
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Skander Mansouri
56%
(
54 of
96)
1st Serve %
66%
(
60 of
91)
9
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
97
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(2) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Clement Chidekh
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
August Holmgren
Player
Brayden Schnur
57%
(
75 of
132)
1st Serve %
66%
(
90 of
136)
17
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
77%
(
58 of
75)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
66 of
90)
60%
(
34 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
30%
(
40 of
132)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
136)
138
Total Points Won
130
|
6-7(8) 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Brayden Schnur
47%
(
43 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
7
Aces
7
13
Double Faults
5
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
58%
(
28 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
30 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
34 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(11) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Brayden Schnur
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
9
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
50 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
35 of
51)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
33 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
87)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Darian King
Player
Brayden Schnur
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
3 of
24)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Brayden Schnur
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brayden Schnur
Player
Maxime Cressy
73%
(
83 of
113)
1st Serve %
61%
(
76 of
125)
7
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
19
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
55 of
76)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
125)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Rijthoven Vs Schnur Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
